To overcome the fragmentation and the overflow data web, there are search engines like Google to algorithms. Powerful but not always very clear on the rules of these algorithms are constantly changing.
There are also tools like twitter that create, through the operation of the social network alerts converging information.
Some attribute this to the automation and collaborative networks, the crisis in the documentary skills whose expertise is precisely the categorization and the development of scattered data, multifaceted and complex. It is precisely here that the "CONTENT curator" seems to emerge. YES, we need of "curative" (conservation, development ... the French translation is still relevant because it would betray the meaning immediately). The curator, as quoted William, is "someone who continually finds, gathers, organizes and sharing content online, the best and most relevant to a specific topic" (1).
Whether it is a professional curator, a group of professionals, community, or people in social network, there are indeed still need information editorialized that, therefore, makes sense and provides value-added data . Question
not yet decided: curator is it a fad whose concept is already death? Is it fundamentally different from intelligence activities, indexing and publishing of our business?
Partly yes, but the "writing head participatory" is it, specifically, it is noteworthy and probably add to the skills of our documentary skills.
See also tools associated with the activity of Curation as Pearltrees Curated.by, or Storify Scoop.it.
Stay tuned!
(1) The name I Would Give It Is Content Curator. IS A Content Curator Finds Someone Who Continually, groups, Organizations and Share the best and MOST is happy there online Specific Issue. Rohit Bhargava
0 comments:
Post a Comment